First off, most coop owners (80% of the
apartments in the city are coops) aren’t responsible for
repairing many of the deficiencies an inspector might find. Especially
problems that relate to the roof, windows, load bearing structure,
plumbing and electrical systems. The board generally has to fix
these kinds of problems.
If you have an inspection and put requirements
in the purchase contract for an owner to fix problems that are technically
the responsibility of the board, you might as well forget about
buying right then and there. Most boards simply will not approve
a transfer of shares to a new owner if there are repair contingencies
in the contract for which they (the board) are responsible.
They in fact may be responsible for them, but
they are often not inclined to approve a new owner if he or she
is insisting on the board making repairs, even minor ones, as part
of the purchase agreement (and most coop owners are powerless to
get a board to quickly make any kind of repairs unless they are
brought on by an emergency of some sort).
Additionally the board may believe, perhaps unjustly,
that the potential new owner will be a nitpicker about maintenance
that they would just as soon not have to deal with on a regular
basis down the road.
The same issues can come up in the sale of condos,
but because board approval is generally a formality, the board itself
is unlikely to block a sale solely on the basis of making the purchase
contingent on repairs to the unit. Here again, however, most sales
have no inspections, but the reason to a large degree is more along
the lines of:
"That’s the way we do things in Manhattan.
If you don’t like it, don’t buy here."
What’s contributed to this attitude may be obvious to many
of you. For a number of years now, neither coop or condo owners
have had to worry about selling. It wasn’t necessary to accept
contracts that had any kind of contingency -- inspection contingencies
or mortgage approval clauses, to name two of the most common in
other real estate markets. There was always another buyer around
the corner ready to buy with no strings attached. So a culture has
evolved where there is almost an expectation among sellers –
apparently perpetuated in part just from breathing the rarified
air here – that a buyer will know better than to even ask
for such things.
Our purpose is not to champion this practice,
but to simply make you aware of it.
This is often not the case in the outer boroughs
by the way, where inspections are fairly common. But, in keeping
with the many unique elements of the purchasing process in the city,
the Manhattan community has developed its own way of doing things,
and skipping the inspection has become the norm. Many real estate
brokers, in fact, commonly advise against getting one.
Their reasoning involves two major points. Number
one we discussed above. Many sellers and most boards won’t
approve a purchase contract with repair contingencies. An inspection
request is a "deal killer" at the outset.
Number two – in addition to red flags that
might be raised by the buyer’s attorney during the "due
diligence" phase – a seller must by law, if specifically
asked by a buyer, reveal any known defects in his or her unit (including
a statement regarding asbestos hazards in older buildings). Taken
together these afford a measure of "protection" for buyers,
helping them decide if they wish to proceed with the purchase
As we’ve intimated, a culture has evolved
in the city where most sellers ignore purchase offers requiring
inspections. They sell their unit "as is". Take it or
leave it. We’re not saying this is the way it "should"
be, or that this is the way it is in other cities. Just the way
it’s been done here.
Buyers new to this market may find it hard to
believe, but after you make three or four offers on different apartments
and have each one turned down (often for a variety of reasons, a
low offer being the most common of course, but also including the
submission of various contract "contingencies" unacceptable
to the seller, including inspection clauses), you ultimately end
up writing one with no contingencies what-so-ever – or end
up never finishing in "first place" on the apartment you
really want.
Of course we understand the merits of having a
property inspected. And with sales slowing, more homeowners may
be amenable to granting them. But this is a touchy issue with strong
feelings for and against – and for now, no matter how logical
they are from a buyer’s perspective, you will generally be
"bucking tradition" if you insist on one.
We think it best to weigh your broker’s
input carefully before you make a final decision one way or the
other.
If you’re dead set on an inspection, here’s
what you need to know.
There are a variety of "certified" or
licensed professionals you can hire to go through a unit from top
to bottom, and determine any deficiencies that need correcting (typical
price is $500 - $1000).
The inspection should take place before signing the contract –
during the due diligence phase. The advantage is obvious, you’ll
know of any defects at the outset – and you can choose, if
you wish, to try and negotiate repairs, price adjustments or simply
not proceed with the purchase.
We can’t resist restating, however, what
we’ve tried to make obvious throughout this section: Much
of the time in the Manhattan market, the only thing a seller will
do is guarantee that whatever the apartment’s condition on
the day you sign the contract, that’s the condition it will
be in on the day of closing.
Some Additional Information
For those who are curious, here is a detailed
list of what a professional inspector typically looks at, to the
degree possible, in a multiunit building:
Building Exterior: Condition of bricks, façade,
walls, paint, caulking, sidewalks, drainage
Basic Building Structure: condition of common area
structural elements including foundation, basement, joists or floor
slabs, rafters, walls, ceiling
Building Systems: evaluate boiler, elevators, mechanical
and environmental systems
Roof: Evaluate its general condition, where it
is in its life cycle, look for leaks, damage, etc.
Apartment Interior: Condition of floor, walls,
ceiling, doors and windows. Check for evidence of water damage.
Bathroom: check operation of tub, toilet, shower,
faucets, etc. Check tub enclosure, condition of tile and grout.
Kitchen: Evaluate cabinets and check operation
and condition of all appliances
Plumbing: Check type and condition of pipes (lead,
copper, plastic), drains, fixtures, and hot water supply.
Heating and Air Conditioning: functionally check
and evaluate their condition.
Electrical: check condition and operation of all
switches, fixtures, outlets, wiring, circuit breakers and main service
panel.
Evaluate Insulation: check for energy rating and for mold.
Evaluate other built-in or hard-wired systems as
applicable: security, intercom, entertainment, central vacuum, etc.
Note: only some inspectors are
state licensed engineers. This doesn’t mean that unlicensed
inspectors are to be avoided – many do a great job and have
been through some type of certification process – but if you
want someone with the expertise of degreed engineer, take note of
the inspectors credentials. As with most things in life, you’ll
pay accordingly.
Close Window
Blue Pearl
Services Legal
Contact
|